Vaporizing HEALTH THREATS
One of the biggest concerns about electronic cigarettes and vaporizers is that people are not informed concerning the potential risks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration consider them to be a tobacco product, even though they do not contain tobacco. Because of this, they are not subject to exactly the same regulations as traditional cigarettes. Furthermore, they often emit toxins and bacteria in to the air while also releasing carbon monoxide.
Smoking while on an electronic cigarette has been associated with lower IQ, reduced attention span, reduced learning skills, decreased brain development, and increased anxiety. Because the neurological and physical health effects can vary tremendously from one person to another, it is essential that vaporizers are used in conjunction with other smoking cessation methods. By decreasing the overall nicotine consumption through alternative methods, we are able to reduce the potential for negative side effects from vaporizing cigarettes and e-juices.
According to the American Heart Association, long-term exposure to secondhand cigarette smoke is from the threat of stroke, coronary artery disease, and certain types of cancer. Long-term cigarette use may also lead to diabetes, stroke, and heart attack. Not only is long-term exposure dangerous for adults, nonetheless it can also affect teenagers and even children. While no long-term unwanted effects have been identified for teen vapers, the associated risks should be discussed with the teenager and his or her parents. It is important to fully explain the negative consequences of teen vaping to help them understand the seriousness of the new method of getting nicotine.
There is a study published in the Journal of Element Vape the American Medical Association showing evidence that younger smokers who started smoking at a later age were more likely to have long-term depression, pre-term delivery, and smoking-related cancers. This study was observational, meaning that researchers considered whether the observed associations were actually due to the e-cigarette. Another study published in the Nicotine Treatment Centers, which is area of the University of Michigan’s Public Health Service, studied the impact of electronic cigarettes on nicotine replacement therapy products. This non-scientific study centered on the usage of bupropion, an antidepressant, and discovered that smokers using bupropion as a nicotine replacement had better outcomes than those not taking the medication. The study did not evaluate long-term usage of e-cigs, but since many long-term sufferers of depression along with other mental disorders often turn to vaporizing alternatively, the study provides additional support for the theory that it might be an effective treatment option.
Since many people think that e-cigs are less harmful than cigarettes, there has been little research specialized in investigating the possible links between smoking and vaping health risks. Just about the most common claims is that e-cigs do not cause cancer because users inhale less smoke than they do with a regular cigarette. Since the combustion within an e- cigarette is much cleaner than in a normal cigarette, some feel that it is harmless.
Since vaporizing tobacco is believed to produce far fewer toxic smoke particles than smoking marijuana or tobacco, there is some debate about whether vapes tend to be more dangerous than smoking. However, since vaporizing tobacco is a relatively new phenomenon, there is no concrete evidence of any harm. Smoking marijuana has been illegal for quite some time, yet marijuana still causes deaths. There is much anecdotal evidence that folks who’ve smoked weed report a rigorous, racing sensation and chest pain upon inhalation. Studies of vaporizing tobacco usually do not consistently report that same degree of intensity or frequency.
Most of the studies that focus on the consequences of e-cigs compare it to smoking marijuana or tobacco, ignoring the fact that most vaporizers usually do not burn the tobacco at all. This study viewed the lung injury risk associated with two popular makes of vaporizing e- cigarettes, blu-tack and Cooljazz. Both brands contain nicotine, that is the substance most in charge of lung injury. The study discovered that both brands cause approximately exactly the same amount of injuries, mainly lacerations of the upper respiratory system. This study’s sample group was made up of smokers, however the general population would be at a significantly lower risk only if current or former marijuana smokers would partake in these e-cigs. It really is unclear whether vaporizing poses less risk than smoking; however, it is clearly much safer than ingesting the substance directly through the lungs.
When considering the potential cardiovascular disease risks, this study finds that there is no difference between users of vaporized cigarettes and smokers. In addition, it notes that long-term use may lead to an increased threat of esophageal cancer and cancers of the mouth and throat. The biggest concern in both cases seems to be the nicotine addiction. Since nicotine is present in virtually every puff of the cigarette, there is certainly a risk of this becoming addictive. It is unknown whether it will become more addictive in the future, but it is really a real concern for researchers since it is one of the largest and most immediate smoking related health threats.